Who wants a Sarlac Prime skin?


#61

Didn’t realize this was the Price is Right. Crap.


#62

Yeah, guys. It’s necessary not to overshoot. I just made up the lottery’s algorithm in like 5 sec.

If you have better thoughts I’d like to know them for possible future times…in PM.


#64

I guess it’s too late to change the rules though.


#65

Right below. If you pick right above them, you have to be exactly right. If it’s above you, you lose, if it’s below you, they’re closer.


#66

Nice catch! I was just discussing about fairness via PM :slight_smile:


#67

You have it backwards. The rule is ‘closest without going over’. Player A picks 1, Player B picks 2. Unless a 1 is rolled, Player B is going to be exactly correct or below it. Player A can only win on a 1.


#68

I wrote out a whole long response with a bunch of examples and yeah you’re right


#69

Ok, guys, should I change the rules in the middle of game then? I could make a poll if it’s what you wish. Then we’ll check if majority wants rules to be changed.

What are your suggestions? Just the closest? Roll until someone wins EXACTLY?


#70

Eh, closest is good enough. Lower number can be the tie breaker (if 100 is rolled and two people picked 99 and 101, 99 wins)?

Up to you.


#71

The 4 closest should play a tournament. The winner gets the skin. It could be any kind of tournament really. Like rock paper scissors. Or tic tac toe. Or checkers. Or some other game. Idk.


#72

Bah, too much effort.


#73
  1. 4 is the only true number. Other numbers only pretend to be numbers, period.

#74

And i thought you would say 6…


#75

@discobot roll 1d500


#76

Did you know that the maximum number of sides for a mathematically fair die is 120?

:game_die: 93


#77

I choose 111
prettymuch15charakters


#78

The only thing that should be done is not changing the rules after the game as started :wink:


#79

7 :sirpenti: sjkh2rhnryhryhru5j6ru4rurjg0h


#80

249 is taken. You gonna snipe that


#81

I already have the skin, so I guess you could say I have no skin in this game…:upside_down_face:

It’s still just a random number. Changing the rule is not super unfair in my opinion. How about you pick 5 different numbers randomly @alplod, take the closest pick from each, and then have those 5 winners pick another number in a PM or something.
…or 10
…or 2
…or whatever.