Duelyst Forums

Variax got a slap on the wrist(s)

#24

Just to be clear then you don’t want the bbs to be tied to variax because she could be killed and you don’t want the bbs hiked because the value becomes poor.

I want the changes because of those reasons. Just to expand on that I think and bbs should be printable as a card that could be put in the game (ala heartseeker). The awesome bbs’ are not printable in their current states. This boggles my mind.

I agree with your breakdown on the timekeeping aspects but what it comes down to for me is if you have to choose between balancing something for competitive vs for the player base you go with the player base otherwise no one’s going to play your game. I can play bad decks and have fun but I can’t play bad decks into variax. This is bad.

Slow control metas suck I agree.

#25

I agree the game should be balanced for the player base, but it should be balanced both ways. I understand that that’s what you want for Variax, but my point is that if that’s what happens Variax becomes unplayable. Why it’s unplayable when those changes are implemented is what I already discussed, but it comes down to the card having no immediate value. Very few cards without immediate or unconditional value are considered strong.

Awesome BBS as a card would be super neat, and add a whole other kind of archetype to Abyssian. Hopefully wouldn’t be too weak.

#26

I think the change is perfect. Anything more would have destroyed the card, and now it should no longer be too overwhelming at lower levels.

As it stands, I think Nosh-rak, Embla and Zendo are all better ways to close out the game, as they are answer or die, not ‘answer or possibly die in two or three turns.’

#27

To be fair Variax isn’t ‘answer or possibly die in two or three turns.’ it’s ‘kill me now or face the swarm, btw check out my stormmetal golem :wink:.’ This is my big beef with the card.

I agree that Nosh and Zendo are better finishers but atleast you can answer them.

#28

Isn’t this kind of a semantic difference? Yes, you may be able to occasionally remove the other grandmasters without consequences, and they have no everlasting effect, but it’s more likely they’ll kill you off immediately. Don’t you feel you have a lot more room to come up with answers in the extra time Variax gives you?

2 Likes
#29

Variax nerf doesn’t solve the problem duelyst has with the lategame. This patch seemes to me somewhat temporary, it shows how much work they have with new mode and mobile release. But I like where are they going. I like every change that slowes down a game though.

2 Likes
#30

good thought

fifteen characters

#31

Your suggestions kill a perfectly fine card.

Variax is a powerful late game play, and that is exactly what it should be. Lategame duelyst is supposed to be two mages using everything they got. It is where the big comboriffic plays happen. Variax is certainly one of those.

The key thing here is that variax is also really slow in that it will take a full turn before you can make use of its effect. Meanwhile, the 8/8 body is nice, but it does not compare to what other things you can get at that cost. It will remain a killer for slow decks that lack a good endgame strategy.

1 Like
#32

I don’t see how it is a slap on wrist,It went from being ramp out on 5 to 6 .It probably goes from being able to play it in any Abyss deck to only being able to play in only in ramp decks.

The inevitable win condition is only a issue early when brought out just slight later it is big deal.Before it was

Turn 5-Varaix
Turn 6 Awesome BBS
Turn 7-Oh crap your in trouble

Now it is

Turn 6-Variax
Turn 7-Awesome BBS
Turn 8- Which one of us is going die.

Like it or not duelyst games end around 6 to 8 mana alot. Two slow turns at 6 and 7 is not a good thing ,They are going to be a alot of sad Abyss players dying before they get to attack with their wraithlings now

2 Likes
#33

I think that Variaxs Nerf is bad designed. Now its too slow, i prefer revenant over her 100%. The only 8 mana cards that are playable are obliterate and spiral tecnique because they are game ending cards. Upping the cost of awesome bbs to 5 mana would make the card more fair and still playable.

#34

My first impression so far is this is more significant than people think. I have been playing Variax since it was released and obviously there were some bad match ups against aggro. Even against some control opponents it was too slow prior to the nerf. Now a match against magmar or tempo Argeon is almost a forgone conclusion and the control decks that it was good against now have an extra turn to find their finisher which quite frankly happens a lot. Whybot and Mathspy basically hit the nail on the head with their comments. If you are losing to Variax consistently at this point it isn’t Variax that is the issue.

Truthfully I was considering going with Meltdown control Fae anyway as it felt more consistent, but now it just seems obviously better.

3 Likes
#35

Exactly, now you ramp It out at 6 mana or its a Dead card

1 Like
#36

You do have alot more time but there is only one answer, win.

#37

Just a bullshit suggestion here but what if Variax’s stats remains the same (regardless of 7 cost,7/7 or 8 cost ,8/8)… and the awesome effect becomes something like this:

Cost 3: Summon 3 Wraithlings & one Wraith Ritualyst.

Wraith Ritualyst
Cost 5, 2/2
At the end of your turn, destroy all of your Wraithlings & deal damage to the enemy general equal to X. (X is the total Atk of all the Wraithlings destroyed during the end turn.)

Reasoning:
The OC unit is easy to remove so there.
Synergy with Furosa or Crytographer for 6 damage of the bloodborn proc.
Synergy with other Ritualyst’s since the damage equals to the Wraithlings destroyed AT THE END TURN.
Synergy with Bloodmoon, Shadowdancer & Grimoire.
Artifacts have slight advantage since it’s not an endless ping.
Does clog up your field. Thus, more easy to play on less efficient devices.
Works marvelously if you can set up a stable field of wraitlings. Thus, encourages to work for it.
You can still utterly lose from this.

#38

How would this work with BMP?

#39

If you have wraithlings spawn near the enemy General it’s some extra damage, or damage on their minions. Plus when your wraithlings are killed she’ll generate more.

Personally this design is even less interactive, since your BBS spawns the special wraith and the damage is at the end of your turn, your opponent has no chance to retaliate for guaranteed at least 3 damage every turn. And what’s the point in spawning 3 wraithlings if they die at the end of your turn, and you can’t move them? Just deal three damage.

3 Likes
#40

You would get a 2/2 body and if he sticks next turn is a a guaranteed 6 damage with another 2/2 body. Also deathwatch stacks. It’s more interactive than the current version and is preferable for it. That speaks more to the current state than anything though.

Random thoughts; you’d need 4 open spaces next to your general (meaning no corner camping) else there’s a chance you don’t get the ritualyst. You didn’t specify if the ritualyst itself is a wraithling we’ve assumed it isn’t. Comboing with cryptographer means you would have to bbs then move to bss again (needing 8 open spaces).

Edit: To clarify it’s more interactive because it requires 4 open spaces next to the general to get the damage effect where as currently you only need 2 for maximum effect. This version still suffers from most problems as explained in previous posts.

Also with the refering to the adjusting to variax stats and cost reviewing the discussion it seems his casting cost wasn’t considered. Lowering his cost and stats would be fine with the suggested changes in the opening post.

#41

I see. Then, how about this one.

Variax, Cost 7, 7/7

Cost 3,
Summon 3 Wraithlings & Agonizes all Wraithlings. (Essentially give all Wraithlings the “Grasp of Agony” that deals damage to your enemies)

#42

If you give a wraithling Grasp of Agony, when it dies it would explode on you not your enemy, which would actually kill your own wraithlings and make an even bigger explosion :fire:. So you would have to give them a different ability if you want it to be useable (or simply change the name of the effect :wink:).

#43

Well, THAT is what I am aiming for & I agree. “Agony” would make it seems like its Grasp of agony. How about “Blights”?

Y’know, Darkest Dungeon Blight.