Just want to direct you guys over to my reddit thread in regards to Disenchanting cards for spirit! This has been recently updated and has a new, easier to read format. Enjoy!
Updated Disenchanting Guide for Legendary & Epic Cards
3 Likes
Not to be disrespectful or anything but the list seems way too opinionated for what should be a guide to something as serious as disenchanting cards or even crafting. I would also say the same for the newer exansions cards cause i really doubt anyone can prpperly evaluate all the cards in 2 days. Appreciate the effort made on your part to benefit the community however.
Eh if something seems off u let me know, but I think I reached pretty far out there with some cards.
I don’t know man, I agree with most of them
Would you prefer if I sent it in the thread if we discussed it on discord?
For all we know I might be wrong but imma send what I think are shady options and y’all can let me know.
Wherever is easier for you chief.
Okay so ill do them according to faction.
- Lyonar
Surgeforger is listed as disenchant on the premise that he is too slow and expensive to play for swarm decks but Ironcliffe Monument which cost 1 extra mana and takes two additional turns to come online is under archetype? I would say that its quite the opposite. Same goes for Call to Arms because it is a 7 mana +3/+3 buff to all your minions played after this cards effect is activated which to me sounds slower than even Doom cause atleast doom requires no further investment to close off a game. Oh and i believe call to arms’ effect can be dispelled.
It seems as if although alot of their cards are held back by their weak archetypes you still list them as “disenchant” but then you also go and list other cards included in weak archetypes as “archetype”. Such as for sunstrike if anything I would say this card is more of a tech card than anything and it seems as if your being way too generous with cards like sol pontiff and Aurora which will probably not being seeing p’ay anytime soon and either way would most likely not be worth the dust cost.
- Songhai
Once again you listed Penumbraxx as a disenchant but then went on to list Second Sword Sarugi as a tech card. What exactly does it tech against? Yeah I could understand if you said archetype but even that would be a stretch for this card, Penumbraxx requires alot less investment and overall is a more reliable and way less meme tier card than Sarugi as of now. Although I do believe they are nowhere near to being keeps or staples for players now starting off but it doesnt exactly seem reasonable to place Sarugi above Penum.
Next on the list we have Caligrapher and Twilight Fox. Here you have Caligrapher listed as a tech and I could kind of understand that but it seems like a stretch to me because for a list like this its meant to benefit newer players so they would know what cards to go crafting and which ones they really would not need for competitive. Caligrapher is a fun random draw card but nothing else as of now. On to Twilight fox now. You listed that the reason he is an “archetype” card is because he can be used to counter opponents who hug the walls but wouldnt that make him a tech card? Plus if we were being real twilight fox would easily be a disenchant on an objective list.
- Vetruvian
Pretty neat to me.
- Abyssian
Infest is easily a disenchant card unless you plan on countering a 2015 swarm deck. Now we return to how your list is flawed in terms of listing cards under archetype and tech. Rite of the undervault is listed as a disenchant because it is now too expensive at 6 but then I remember you listed Caligrapher as a tech card because its a good draw engine? Come on man be consistent. Rite can literally refill your hand at 6 mana with cards from your deck while Cali is randomly generated. I’m not saying Rite is a good card but you gotta be consistent in these kinds of list.
Corporeal Cadence is a meme card at best and if its being listed as a tech card because he can do “stuff” then every card in this list should be listed as a tech card.
- Magmar
Iridium Scales is a tech card not an archetype card.
Visionar listed as disenchant is understandable but then Vindicator listed as archetype when they are both bad but the only difference is vindicator is gonna cost more spirit? Consistency.
- Vanar
Hyrdogarm is too slow to ever become a good card. (Guess we will have to wait and see for this one)
In conclusion the problem I had with your list is that it seems to say one thing for certain cards and give reason as to why but then say another thing for other cards but give the same reason why.
This topic was automatically closed 5 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.