The Functional Card Text Project (Alpha) - Feedback Needed!


#21

I’m sure a lot of people would appreciate you or someone else writing up a handbook for these distinctions! I’m not sure that’d offer something that’s not on the Gamepedia though.

Wow.


#22

Well, I guess if you had to pick 2 things to respond to…

though you could have at least included the smiley in the quote so people would know it wasn’t intended as harsh as you have implied.


#23

Apologies, maybe I should’ve quoted this part instead:

Wow.

I didn’t find anything else in your comment that engages with what I’m trying to do. Parts are just your opinion and the rest is a discussion of how certain keywords work. And frankly, you casting aspersions on my motives for doing things plain old hits a nerve with me which in turn really dampens my enthusiasm for discussing with you.


#24

Inquisitor Kron would be worded similarly to Pandora

“Whenever you replace a card, summon a 2/2 Prisoner with Rush, Ranged, Frenzy, Flying, Forcefield, or Provoke at random on a nearby space”

I don’t think Spriggin can be templated well. Each Spriggin Kin has a very wordy effect.

Yes. The only exception is Aspect of Shim’zar. That spell can transform a minion into any Battle Pet except RAWR.


#25

Kron should work out, judging by the length of your text. It really annoys me that I wouldn’t be able to apply the same template to all of these cards, makes me want to default to the shortest version. It’s not a huge deal becasue Spriggin doesn’t see a lot of play. I’ll think on it a bit more.

Those Battle Pet spawn pools are a total mess, yikes. Thank you for the illumniation.

To everyone: I’m making revisions behind the scenes and will be sure to update for Immortal Vanguards when it drops!


#26

This topic was automatically closed 5 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.